Coverage and Benefit Design

An expert panel of 4 payer and 6 provider stakeholders was convened to discuss opportunities for CGM-based care management in risk-sharing agreements between payers and providers. The panelists were surveyed before 2 virtual roundtable meetings, during which pertinent clinical and trend data were shared.

All payer participants cited using interdisciplinary care management for type 2 diabetes (T2D) and 50% used a digital health platform, but only 25% featured an integrated CGM component. All payer participants responded that “fingerstick” glucose management was either inadequate or questionable for use in current care management programs for T2D. Conversely, 100% also responded that CGM would improve their care delivery solutions. These findings were published as an abstract in the Journal of Managed Care and Specialty Pharmacy and presented in a poster at the 2025 Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy Annual Meeting, including parameters for optimizing risk-sharing agreements incorporating CGM. Specifically, the expert panelists outlined 3 key elements of risk-sharing agreements: agreement design, realistic outcomes measures, and strategies to facilitate payer and provider participation. The recommendations provided by the panel may be valuable for managed care and payer decision makers in shaping risk-sharing agreements to advance the utilization of CGM and improve member outcomes in the management of T2D.

Albright J, McCormick D, Pourarsalan H, Pangrace M. Payer-Provider Risk-Sharing Agreements to Advance Continuous Glucose Monitoring–Based Care in Type 2 Diabetes. Presented at the AMCP Annual Meeting; Houston, TX: April 2, 2025. [Poster E6.]

A poster presented at the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy’s (AMCP) annual meeting in New Orleans, LA, shared data from a health initiative by Metro Nashville Public Schools. The employer provided CGM devices as a pharmacy benefit without prior authorization. This policy change led to a two-fold increase in CGM utilization among employees aged 18 to 64 years with T1D and T2D regardless of treatment regimen. The retrospective analysis, covering 184 participants, showed significant improvements in glycemic control associated with CGM use. Specifically, average A1c decreased from 8.7% to 7.9% and from 7.6% to 6.8% among those with T2D treated with insulin and not-treated with insulin, respectively. Additionally, CGM use resulted in a significant improvement in the proportion of individuals meeting the HEDIS and ADA HbA1c targets of <8.0% and <7.0%, respectively. These results underscore the potential benefits of CGM for improving diabetes management through streamlined health care payer and purchaser coverage.